|
Trestle work begins with June goalBy Advocate Staff -Motorists on Highway 1 and Visitors to Pudding Creek Beach have surely noticed the presence of construction equipment and workers on the trestle. Workers from Abacus Construction of Redding create a worker safety rail across the Pudding Creek trestle. Tony Reed photo. Thoughts in 2001The state is broke. Texas energy companies (or their corporate officers) have all of California's savings. State Parks can't fund the trestle project, even though they now now the pilings are in good condition. State Parks thinks they need to spend upwards of $250,000. Seems like we could do it ourselves one weekend. Maybe we should. Should the commuity take over the trestle?Dogs chased from shorebird habitat Stretch of state beach to ban canines, campfires to protect threatened
plover By PAUL PAYNE Dogs and campfires will be banned on dozens of state beaches under plans to protect the snowy plover, a tiny shorebird threatened by pets and humans, California State Parks officials said Thursday.
In Sonoma County, the restriction covers a stretch of coastline about 3 miles long, from Mussel Point to Coleman Beach, including Salmon Creek, a beach popular with dog owners. In Mendocino County the ban covers Mac-Kerricher State Beach. "I guess I won't be going to the beach anymore," said Angie Connors of Santa Rosa, who owns two Labrador retrievers. "I feel so bad for my puppies." Dog owners and their pets have enjoyed a long run at Sonoma County beaches, often ignoring existing leash laws that are posted. Federal beaches, such as Point Reyes National Seashore in Marin, already ban dogs. The Western snowy plover, about 6 inches long with black, brown and white feathers, makes its home along the West Coast from Washington to Mexico. Its population is centered in California, at about 25 beaches. Because the plover nests near high-tide lines where people and dogs play, its numbers have been cut in half since the 1970s, parks officials said. Officials said the rationale behind the ban is clear: Dogs chase and kill birds; people who make campfires gather driftwood, disturbing nesting areas. Also, kites will be banned on some beaches, but not in Sonoma County, because plovers are spooked by them. "They scare the bird," Capps said. "They think kites are predators." The U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, which lists the bird as threatened under the Endangered Species Act, has mapped critical habitat areas in California where the plover could make a comeback. Among them are Silver Strand State Beach in San Diego, McGrath State Beach in Ventura, Pismo Beach in San Luis Obispo County and Manresa State Beach in Santa Cruz. Other beaches include San Onofre State Beach in Orange County, Montana de Oro State Beach in San Luis Obispo County and Half Moon Bay State Beach in San Mateo County. A more comprehensive list of beaches that will have the ban on dogs and campfires was not immediately available. For its part, the state will enforce the ban, which strengthens a mandatory leash law already in place on state beaches that allow dogs. On some state beaches, officials may choose to simply fence off plover habitat areas, Capps said. Parks officials on the North Coast said they will enforce the ban. They are preparing signs and pamphlets explaining the new restrictions. Fines for violating the ban have not been set. Plover breeding lasts from spring to mid-fall, coinciding with the beach season, said Dan Cooper, director of bird conservation for the Audubon Society. The birds lay one to three eggs in nests that are simple scrapes in the sand. Eggs hatch in 27 days, and within hours, the chicks are on the beach searching for food. Rick Royer, North Coast state parks spokesman, said dog owners will undoubtedly be upset by the ban, but most will understand the need to protect threatened species. While she sympathized with the plover's plight, Bea Maxwell of Santa Rosa said this week that the ban would remove one of the few public places she can take her dog Ginger. "I don't want to do anything to hurt the bird, but my dog loves the beach," she said. "It's sad." New Researcher Vonnie Matthews contributed to this article. You can reach Staff Writer Paul Payne at 521-5250 or ppayne@pressdemocrat.com. Thursday, October 11, 2001 - 9:16:36 AM MST State Parks making headway on MacKerricher connection By Greg W. Picard Thursday, October 11, 2001 - It has been a long "haul" these past years to make a revitalized trail connecting Fort Bragg with the MacKerricher State Park coastline. In July 2002 the State Legislature will consider approving a project to repair the Pudding Creek Trestle with state funds. State Parks expects the Environmental Impact Report to be complete and the regulatory agency approval for trestle and trail repair plans (from, among others, the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, the California Department of Fish and Game, and the Mendocino County Planning Department) by July 2002 as well. In the meantime State Parks has been doing historic and environmental studies through its contractor, EDAW, along the route of the trail from the trestle to Lake Cleone, and in addition has done a Timber Bridge Inspection through a contract with Cole/Yee/Schubert & Associates. The bridge report gives clear guidance for needed repairs and was very encouraging in that it indicated the trestle is in great shape for its age. It will be able to be reopened for pedestrian and bicycle use with relatively minor work. Soon, we will begin the design phase in order to be ready to construct in approximately late 2002. What remains is to move forward with environmental studies and a management plan that incorporates habitat restoration, endangered species management and protection, and appropriate access in the Inglenook Fen Ten-Mile Dunes Preserve north of Ward Avenue. Since the dune complex is protected as a preserve, trail access will likely be minimal and not the traditional paved road surface found on the remainder of the Coastal Trail. Until this process is accomplished, all pedestrian traffic north of Ward Avenue has been routed along the wave action zone or on the exposed pavement of the existing portions of the old logging Haul Road. Equestrians are to ride only on the wet sand. Current approved beach access is available through the tunnel at Ward Avenue and the beach ramp approximately 300 yards north of the same location. As was pointed out during the Feasibility Studies and public meetings conducted in the year 2000, Section 5019.71 of the California Public Resources Code says "The purpose of natural preserves shall be to preserve such features as rare or endangered plant and animal species and their supporting ecosystems" Policy number 40 of the State Park and Recreation Commission says that "public uses and facilities in preserves shall be limited to those required to permit the public observation, enjoyment, and understanding of the prime resources, and shall be compatible with the preservation of the prime resources, and shall conform to unit resource elements and general plans." Roads, motorized vehicles, and all facilities except trails are prohibited in natural preserves. The MacKerricher General Plan (1995) is the result of much study and many public meetings. It states that access to the dunes shall be restricted in general to the beach, and no casual use is to be allowed in the Inglenook Fen. The plan does call for controlled use through the development of boardwalks and guided tours. State Parks is pursuing the development of appropriately designed trails through the area, which in the past has generally been assumed will in part reuse the remains of the existing logging road. Whether it does or not remains to be seen, and exactly where trails go is still to be decided. The feasibility study conducted in 2000 determined that constructing a hardened trail surface was not feasible due to the instability of the dunes and endangered species impacts. The California Department of Fish and Game, as well as the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service have been critical of the Department of Parks and Recreation in the past for failing to adequately protect the Natural Preserve, which is home to federally listed endangered wallflower, spineflower, marsh sandwort, the federally listed threatened Snowy Plover, and other species of concern. The Endangered Species Act requires the protection of these listed species. Impacts or "take" of these species result from dogs chasing birds, people and horses trampling through nesting habitat, and without adequate park staffing these impacts have been difficult to control. State Parks is, however, successfully meeting part of our obligation for species protection by removing European beachgrass, which impacts nesting and plant habitat for listed endangered species. This action is supported and applauded by the Department of Fish and
Game and the U.S. Fish and Wildlife service, and they have given funding
assistance to State Parks to assist in completing restoration projects
in the dunes. © 1999-2001 MediaNews Group, Inc.
|
|
Pudding Creek Trestle
|
Living on the Coast... I'd like to start right off. I'm mad.
The State Parks have been telling us that the trestle would be ready for
pedestrians "within 2 years" for 10 years now. The last
time was at a city council meeting on October 10, 2000. Gary Shannon said
it would need an E.I.R. and take "12 to 18 months". I repeat what I said at that October 10, 2000 Fort Bragg City Council
meeting:
|
from http://www.mcn.org/1/10milecoastaltrail/history.htm
Although a coastal trail running from Fort Bragg to the Ten Mile River was probably used by the local Pomo and Coast Yuki people for centuries before the arrival of European settlers, a trail route was first documented in 1857. As the southern end of the Humboldt trail running to Eureka, the trail ran north along the coastal bluffs then dropped to the beach north of Ward Avenue to the Ten Mile River. In 1915-16 the Union Lumber Company built a logging railroad parallel to the trail and just inland from the beach. The first train carrying logs from the Ten Mile River to the mills in Fort Bragg ran on January 3, 1917. There are some remains of the old railroad which can be seen underlying the logging road north of Ward Avenue where both have been eroded by the ocean. The railroad ran across five trestles, one spanning Pudding Creek (545 ft long, 44 ft high), one at Virgin Creek (360 ft long, 32 ft high) another west of Lake Cleone (867 ft long, 25 ft high) and two smaller trestles farther north. The trestle at the lake burned and was replaced by an earth berm. The only trestle remaining today is the Pudding Creek trestle. In the summer of 1949 the railroad was paved over in just 21 days to allow trucks to carry logs over the same route. Later, the lumber company opened the road for public access on weekends. Erosion has been a constant problem throughout the history of the logging road. When sections of the road were washed out in 1983 the Georgia Pacific Company, which then owned the road, stopped using it. After 1986, the Department of Parks and Recreation maintained and operated the logging road through an agreement with Georgia Pacific. The agreement terminated in the spring of 1992. The Department acquired the northern portion of the logging road and the Pudding Creek trestle in the summer of 1992 and the rest of the road in early 1995 and the road became part of MacKerricher State Park. State Parks is currently in the process of restoring the road as a multipurpose trail for hikers, bicyclists, equestrians and park maintenance. |
|
|
COMMITTEE REPORTS / SUPERVISORS REPORTS OFF AGENDA ITEM PURSUANT TO GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 54954.2 RESOLUTIONS IN SUPPORT OF MACKERRICHER STATE PARK TRAIL ISSUES Supervisor Campbell reported that Board consideration of this matter is urgent due to the time constraints pertaining to the California Department of Parks and Recreation meeting scheduled for March 29, 2000; and that the issues affect trails in MacKerricker State Park, namely ownership and management of Glass Beach and completion of the Pudding Creek Trestle Bridge. Upon motion by Supervisor Shoemaker, seconded by Supervisor Lucier, and carried unanimously; IT IS ORDERED that this matter arose subsequent to the agenda being published pursuant to Government Code Section 54954.2. |
|
|
||| Subscribe to Fort Bragg Focus||| ||| Directory ||| ||| FortBragg.com ||| |||UnSubcribe from Fort Bragg Focus||| |